Just like federal trial judges, law professors can be both pompous and amusing at the same time

Law professors and federal judges (me in particular, as evidenced by this blog) frequently suffer from the same amusing problem of egotism. Thus, reading Professor Adam Winkler’s  pompous lecture of Justice Ginsburg for telling the New York Times that she was not resigning made me smile.

His article in the Daily Beast is entitled Time For Justice Ginsburg to Step Aside to Save Her Legacy. According to his law school profile, Winkler is a “specialist in American constitutional law” at UCLA.

Given the Justice’s clear and firm statement to the Times that I blogged about here, I wonder what Professor Winkler thought he was accomplishing by essentially telling Justice Ginsburg that a UCLA law professor was unwilling to take her “no” for an answer?

I can see Ginsburg now. “Oh, my God, Adam Winkler thinks that if I don’t resign my legacy will be tarnished. Since I’m an old woman, I desperately need the advice and counsel of a 46-year-old ‘specialist in American constitutional law’ from Hollywood. So, let’s whip up a letter to Barry and tell him to line up some smart law professor like Winkler to replace me.”  That’s the ticket.


6 responses

  1. Maybe some law professors oughtn’t be allowed out in public without their nurses.

    The Supremes are ideologically divided today? How is today different?

    A Justice, of necessity, follows the ideology of the President what brung him? Earl Warren comes to mind….

    And so on. There’s much to dislike about Justice Ginsberg’s opinions, but politics–or ageism–ought have nothing to do with her retirement timing.

    A specialist in American constitutional law ought to know better.

    Eric Hines

  2. It would be instructive if a law professor would read your blog and then write an article about how you should save your legacy. I think that article will never be written. Elaine Mittleman

%d bloggers like this: