On Boyo

R. Keller Kopf, Institute for Land, Water & Society, Charles Sturt University, New South Wales Australia

R. Keller Kopf, Institute for Land, Water & Society, Charles Sturt University, New South Wales, Australia

“From 18-23 August 2013, the 11th INTECOL Congress, Ecology: Into the next 100 years will be held in London as part of the centenary celebrations of the British Ecological Society.The theme of the Congress is advancing ecology and making it count, and will present world class ecological science that will truly move the science forward,” or so says the posting for an important conference on ecology. It is a big deal to present a scientific paper at such a conference.

Our buttons are busting because Boyo (aka R. Keller Kopf, PhD) will be presenting a paper at the conference on Tuesday, August 20, 2013 at 10:30 AM.  Boyo is the lead author on the paper. But, he had a lot help from other Australian scientists. C. Max Finlayson, Sally Hladyz, Paul Humphries and Neil Sims are his coauthors.

This is what the program says about the paper and his presentation:

Global Biodiversity State Indicators and Baselines: a Freshwater Perspective
Governments world-wide have accepted targets to reduce the rate of biodiversity loss but there is debate concerning what indicators and baselines should be used to assess global-scale changes in the state of biodiversity. Previous assessments have been dominated by terrestrial vertebrate and marine habitat indicators yet, based on species per unit of habitat-area, endemism and the threat of loss, we contend that the freshwater biome should receive equitable, if not heightened, consideration. We question whether the current array of biodiversity state indicators and contemporary baselines (eg. 1970) provides an accurate or representative appraisal of the state of global freshwater ecosystems. We suggest that global assessments and Ramsar wetlands of international importance need to consider both historic (pre-industrial) baselines and contemporary novel ecosystem baselines in evaluating biodiversity change. To facilitate rigorous assessment of freshwater biodiversity against 2020 Aichi global targets, we conclude by posing five challenges to researchers and policy makers.

Some things are more important than others.


%d bloggers like this: